Skip to main content
  1. Methodology/

Technical Audit Methodology

Author
Lucerna
Independent OSINT research lab by FolkUp. We verify claims, investigate origins, and audit compliance.

Overview
#

Full framework for evaluating websites, web applications, and digital products. Covers UX, technology stack, performance, security, SEO, and business viability.

Process
#

Phase 1: First Impression (30 seconds)
#

Open the site cold. Note immediately:

  • Does it load fast? (target: < 3s)
  • Is the purpose clear within 5 seconds?
  • Does navigation make sense?
  • Is it mobile-friendly?
  • Any visual bugs or layout issues?

Phase 2: Stack Analysis
#

Frontend
#

  • Framework/library (React, Vue, vanilla, etc.)
  • CSS approach (Tailwind, Bootstrap, custom)
  • JavaScript bundle size and loading strategy
  • Image optimization (WebP, lazy loading, responsive)

Backend
#

  • Server technology (visible headers, response patterns)
  • API structure (REST, GraphQL, etc.)
  • Authentication mechanism
  • Error handling (do errors leak information?)

Third-party Services
#

  • Analytics (Google Analytics, Plausible, etc.)
  • CDN usage
  • Payment processing
  • Chat/support widgets
  • Cookie consent implementation

SEO
#

  • Meta tags (title, description, OG, Twitter)
  • Structured data (JSON-LD, microdata)
  • Sitemap.xml and robots.txt
  • Canonical URLs
  • Mobile-friendliness (Google Mobile-Friendly Test)
  • Core Web Vitals (LCP, FID, CLS)

Performance
#

  • Lighthouse score (Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, SEO)
  • TTFB, FCP, LCP
  • Bundle analysis
  • Caching strategy (headers, service worker)

Security
#

  • HTTPS configuration (SSL Labs grade)
  • Security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, etc.)
  • Cookie security flags (Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite)
  • Visible vulnerabilities (exposed .env, directory listing, etc.)

Phase 3: UX/UI Checklist
#

  • Clear value proposition above the fold
  • Consistent navigation across pages
  • Accessible (WCAG 2.1 AA minimum)
  • Responsive across breakpoints (mobile, tablet, desktop)
  • Forms have proper validation and error messages
  • Loading states for async operations
  • 404 page exists and is helpful
  • Contact/support information accessible
  • Consistent typography and spacing
  • Color contrast meets standards (4.5:1)

Phase 4: Monetization & Conversion
#

  • Revenue model analysis (subscription, freemium, ads, etc.)
  • Conversion funnel mapping
  • CTA placement and clarity
  • Pricing page (if applicable)
  • Competitor comparison (brief)

Phase 5: Bug & Tech Debt Classification
#

Severity Definition Example
Critical Blocks core functionality or causes data loss Payment fails, login broken
Serious Degrades experience significantly Layout breaks on mobile, slow load
Cosmetic Visual issues that don’t block usage Misaligned elements, typos

Phase 6: Cost Estimation
#

Option A: Redesign (fix existing)
#

  • Estimate hours per severity level
  • Apply hourly rate range (junior/mid/senior)
  • Include project management overhead (15-20%)

Option B: Rebuild (from scratch)
#

  • Estimate by component (frontend, backend, integrations)
  • Include discovery/design phase
  • Include testing and deployment

ROI Framework
#

ROI = (Projected Revenue Increase - Cost of Fix) / Cost of Fix × 100%

Consider:

  • Conversion rate improvement potential
  • SEO traffic improvement potential
  • Reduced support costs
  • Reduced tech debt maintenance

Report Format
#

# Technical Audit: [Site/Product Name]

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview]

## Scores
| Category | Score (1-10) |
|----------|-------------|
| Performance | |
| UX/UI | |
| SEO | |
| Security | |
| Code Quality | |
| **Overall** | |

## Key Findings
[Top 5 issues by impact]

## Detailed Analysis
[Full analysis by category]

## Recommendations
[Prioritized action items]

## Cost Estimate
[Option A vs Option B with justification]

Related