Skip to main content
  1. Studies/

Scatology in Culture: Full Research Overview

Author
Lucerna
Independent OSINT research lab by FolkUp. We verify claims, investigate origins, and audit compliance.
Scatology - This article is part of a series.
Part 1: This Article
Research Ethics
This investigation uses only publicly available information (open-source intelligence). No private systems were accessed. All methods are disclosed in the methodology section.
ID INV-033
Type research
Status verified
Confidence HIGH
Sources 200
Reviewed by FolkUp Editorial
Review date 2026-03-03

Project Description
#

The series “Scatology in Culture” is an interdisciplinary OSINT investigation into the role of excrement and bodily waste in global culture, art, philosophy, economics, and science. The research was conducted as part of the FolkUp Research Lab (Lucerna).

Subject: scatology—not as a medical term nor as vulgarity, but as a cultural phenomenon with a millennia-long history. From Diogenes defecating in the marketplace to Manzoni’s jar of feces valued at €275,000—excrement occupies a stable and paradoxical place in the history of human thought.

Methodology: OSINT—systematic collection, verification, and analysis of open-source material across eight research directions. Each direction undergoes a separate in-depth examination grounded in academic sources, archival data, and expert assessment.

Series Structure (9 Materials)
#

Direction 1: Thought and Language
#

Material Topic Sources
Philosophy: From Diogenes to Postmodernism Cynics, Freud, Bataille, Kristeva, Žižek, Laporta 25+
Linguistics: Taboo Etymology Proto-Slavic *govьno, PIE *skeyd-, Tabuation, Euphemisms 30+

Direction 2: Art and Literature
#

Material Topic Sources
Art: From Manzoni to Pavlenskiy Merda d’artista, Ofili, Delvoye, Viennese and Moscow Actionism 25+
Literature: From Rabelais to Sorokin Swift, Sade, Joyce, Kharms, Kundera, Bukowski 25+

Direction 3: Power and Money
#

Material Topic Sources
Economics: From Guano to FMT Startups Guano Wars, Ambergris, Kopi Luwak, Coprolites, Biotech 25+
Politics: Feces as Protest Weapon Diogenes, Luther, Actionism, Biological Weapons, Sanitation and Power 30+

Direction 4: Body and Myth
#

Material Topic Sources
Medicine: Microbiome and the FMT Revolution Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Coprology, Bristol Stool Scale, Microbiome 30+
Mythology: Sacred Excrement Sterquilinus, Scarabaeus, Kavaya-no-kami, Bonnacon, Feast of Fools 25+

10 Functions of Scatology in Culture
#

The research identified ten stable functions that scatology performs in global culture:

  1. Carnivalesque Overthrow of Power—Bakhtin, Rabelais, Fabliaux, Feast of Fools. The bodily lower stratum overturns hierarchy, equalizing king and beggar.

  2. Philosophical Transgression—Bataille, Kristeva, Diogenes. Excrement as the boundary where authentic knowledge begins.

  3. Psychoanalytic Connection to Creativity and Money—Freud. Feces as the child’s first “product,” prototype of exchange and accumulation.

  4. Critique of Hypocrisy and Convention—Swift, Luther, Kundera. “Kitsch = absolute denial of the existence of feces” (Kundera).

  5. Artistic Provocation and Taboo Destruction—Manzoni, Ofili, Serrano. Art tests the boundaries of the permissible.

  6. Political Protest and Actionism—Viennese Actionists, Pavlenskiy, Voina collective. The body becomes a weapon.

  7. Critique of Capitalism and Commodification—Delvoye, Manzoni. The machine that transforms food into feces—a mirror of consumption.

  8. Ideological Exposure—Žižek. Three types of toilets = three political ideologies.

  9. Medical Revolution—FMT, microbiome. Feces transform from waste into medicine.

  10. Economic Engine and casus belli—guano, ambergris, kopi luwak. Wars were fought literally over excrement.

Key Figures
#

Fact Figure
Manzoni’s jar (auction record) €275,000 (2016)
Ofili’s “The Holy Virgin Mary” $4.6 million (2015)
Peruvian guano exports (1840–1870) $500 million
Viking coprolite (estimate) $39,000
Kopi Luwak (wild) $1,300/kg
FMT efficacy for C. difficile 85–90%
Global human feces per year 290–400 million tons

Credibility Markers
#

The series employs a system of markers:

  • [CONFIRMED]—2+ sources, academic consensus
  • [PARTIALLY CONFIRMED]—discrepancies between sources or interpretations
  • [DISPUTED]—no academic consensus
  • [LEGEND]—mythological or folkloric tradition

Metadata
#

  • Investigation ID: INV-033
  • Date: 03.03.2026
  • Language: English (translation)
  • Series: 9 materials (1 overview + 8 thematic)
  • Sources: 200+
  • Research Directions: philosophy, art, literature, economics, politics, linguistics, medicine, mythology

FolkUp Research Lab | Lucerna

Scatology - This article is part of a series.
Part 1: This Article

Related