Scatological motifs in visual art represent one of the most controversial and taboo topics in the history of artistic practice. From medieval manuscripts to provocative twentieth-century performances, bodily excretions and feces have served as instruments of comedy, satire, protest, and conceptual expression. This investigation traces the evolution of scatology in art through key epochs and works, demonstrating the transformation of its functions from religious-didactic to radically subversive.
Medieval Marginalia: Laughter at the Margins of the Sacred #
Medieval manuscripts contained explicitly sexual and scatological images in their margins, where monks and scribes filled blank spaces with depictions of naked figures and bodily functions. These ribald illustrations included monks exposing their buttocks and phallic objects. Scholars theorize that such images may have served as comic relief during long hours of reading religious texts, or conversely, as moral warnings against sinful behavior.
Scatological motifs in marginalia represented a space of carnivalesque inversion of hierarchies: on the margins of sacred texts, a parallel reality of the bodily low unfolds, where norms of piety were temporarily suspended. This tradition of drôlerie (from French: foolish jest) employed the monstrous and grotesque to illustrate sin and evil, creating a visual language of moral instruction through disgust.
Hieronymus Bosch: Scatology of Eschatology #
Hieronymus Bosch did not invent his fantasy from nothing—the type of thinking in which people behave strangely or indecently already existed long before Bosch in the margins of medieval manuscripts. One of Bosch’s greatest innovations was the transfer of figurative and scenic images known as drôleries from the marginalia of illuminated manuscripts to large-scale panel paintings.
In the Hell panel from “The Garden of Earthly Delights” (circa 1500), a bird-headed devil devours souls and drops them into a cesspit in a blue bubble, with the opening that expels the bubble hidden beneath a toilet seat. This scene represents a literal visualization of hell’s digestive system, where sinners pass through the demon’s bodily depths—the ultimate humiliation and dehumanization.
The essay “Holy Shit: Bosch’s Bluebird and the Junction of the Scatological and the Eschatological in Late Medieval Art” analyzes the intersection of the scatological and eschatological in Bosch’s work, demonstrating how bodily excretions become metaphors for spiritual decay and eternal torment.
Pieter Bruegel and Satirical Engraving #
Bosch’s tradition was continued by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, whose compositions abounded with scenes of folk life with its unvarnished corporeality. Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century engravings actively employed scatological motifs in political and religious satire: defecation became a visual metaphor for corruption, hypocrisy, and moral impurity of the powerful.
Dada: Scatology of Protest #
The Dada movement (1916–1924) radically reconceived the function of scatology in art, transforming it from moral instruction into an instrument of total negation of bourgeois culture. Dadaists used the bodily low as a weapon against rationalism, aestheticism, and militarism that had spawned World War I. While direct scatological works in Dada are rare, the very concept of “anti-art” implied symbolic defecation on institutional art and its values.
Piero Manzoni: “Merda d’artista” (1961) #
The conceptual gesture of Italian artist Piero Manzoni represents the culmination of scatology as artistic critique. In May 1961, Manzoni created 90 tin cans, each allegedly containing 30 grams of his own feces. The cans were labeled in Italian, English, French, and German with the inscription: “Merda d’artista. Net weight 30g. Freshly preserved. Produced and canned in May 1961.”
Originally, the cans were to be valued according to their equivalent weight in gold—$37 per can in 1961, with the price fluctuating based on market conditions. Since then, the work has acquired significant auction value: one can was sold for a record €275,000 in August 2016.
“Merda d’artista” functions on several levels: as mockery of the art market and its absurd economics, as a literalization of the metaphor of “shit art,” as an investigation of relations between artistic production and bodily production, and as a provocation of boundaries between the precious and the repugnant. The work poses a fundamental question: what transforms matter into art—process, context, the artist’s signature, or market value?
Viennese Actionism: Scatology as Ultimate Transgression #
Viennese Actionism (1960–1971) represented a brief and fierce movement in twentieth-century art. Its four primary participants—Günter Brus, Otto Mühl, Rudolf Schwarzkogler, and Hermann Nitsch—became notorious for their use of bodily functions and excrement in performances.
The movement is remembered for its deliberate transgression of naked bodies, destructiveness, and violence. One of the most scandalous performances was the “Art and Revolution” action of 1968. In June 1968, Günter Brus was sentenced to six months imprisonment for the crime of “defamation of state symbols” after an action in Vienna during which he simultaneously masturbated, covered his body with his own feces, and sang the Austrian national anthem. Otto Mühl spent eight months in prison for participating in the same event.
Another significant performance was Mühl’s “Piss Aktion,” in which he stood naked and urinated into Günter Brus’s mouth on stage during the Hamburg Film Festival in 1969. Mühl moved beyond what he called more bourgeois happenings toward what he designated as “direct art,” in which he employed bodily functions (such as urination) as instruments for expressing intense, accumulated energy and the violation of taboos.
Viennese Actionism represented a radical attempt at deconstructing the body as a cultural construct, a return to the “zero degree” of corporeality through extreme forms of naturalism. The accionists’ scatological performances were directed against post-war Austrian society, its hypocrisy, repression, and the unspoken trauma of its Nazi past.
Andrés Serrano: “Piss Christ” (1987) #
“Immersion (Piss Christ)” is a 1987 photograph by American artist Andrés Serrano depicting a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass tank filled with the artist’s urine. Born in 1950 into a Hispanic mixed Catholic family, Serrano considers himself a practicing Christian with an ambivalent relationship to Catholic Church doctrine. Rather than unconditionally accepting the Church’s views on the body, he chose to experiment with images of bodily fluids in his photographic practice.
The photograph was part of a series by Serrano in which classical figurines were submerged in various liquids—milk, blood, and urine. Although most texts on “Piss Christ” focus on controversy, this striking image has received positive evaluation from art historians on formal grounds. The visual effect of the urine is often described as imparting a “luminosity” to the figure of Jesus. Art critic Lucy Lippard characterized the work as mysterious and beautiful, noting that “the small wooden and plastic crucifix becomes virtually monumental, floating, photographically magnified, in a deep pink glow.”
Serrano insisted that such images represent his experiments with photographic abstraction, and that the work was not intended as an overt political statement about religion. He prefers the work to remain ambivalent, and hinted at an interest in the excessive commercialization and devaluation of Christian iconography in contemporary culture.
Chris Ofili: “The Holy Virgin Mary” (1996) #
British artist Chris Ofili created in 1996 a work employing elephant dung and pornographic images to represent the Virgin Mary. The large painting (8 feet tall and 6 feet wide) depicts a Black woman in a blue mantle—the traditional attribute of the Virgin Mary—and is executed in mixed media including oil paint, glitter, polyester resin, as well as elephant dung, pins, and collages of pornographic images. A clump of dried, lacquered elephant dung forms one exposed breast, and the painting itself is displayed leaning against the gallery wall, supported by two other clumps of elephant dung decorated with colored pins arranged to form the words “Virgin” and “Mary.”
The work was included in the “Sensation” exhibition in London, Berlin, and New York in 1997–2000. In October 1999, “Sensation” opened at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, where precisely Ofili’s painting sparked the most intense debates. Rudolph Giuliani, then mayor of New York, called Ofili’s work “sick” and threatened to cut all subsidies to the museum and evict it from the city-owned building. Museum leadership refused to capitulate, and the work remained on the exhibition.
Ofili, raised as a Catholic, commented that “elephant dung itself is a rather beautiful object.” Many of Ofili’s other works from this period include elephant dung, particularly as supports for canvas, which was inspired by time Ofili spent in Zimbabwe. In 1998, Ofili became the first Black artist to receive the Turner Prize.
“The Holy Virgin Mary” functions as a multilayered statement about race, religion, colonialism, and the sacred. The use of elephant dung—a material associated with African culture, where it holds ritual significance—decolonizes the iconography of the Virgin Mary, placing it within an Afro-British context. Simultaneously, the work provokes questions about what is considered “pure” and “impure” in religious representation.
Contemporary Art: Paul McCarthy and the Continuation of Tradition #
American artist Paul McCarthy continues the scatological line in contemporary art through grotesque sculptures and performances employing artificial excrement, bodily fluids, and references to mass culture. His works function as critique of American consumerism, Hollywood, and the hypersexualization of society.
Functions of Scatology in Art: Analytical Summary #
Tracing the path of scatological motifs from medieval marginalia to contemporary art, several key functions emerge:
Didactic Function #
In medieval art, scatology served as moral warning, visualization of sin and hellish punishment through the bodily low.
Carnivalesque Function #
Marginalia and folk imagery employed scatology for the temporary inversion of hierarchies, comic relief, the assertion of the bodily against the overly spiritualized.
Critical Function #
From Manzoni to contemporary artists, scatology becomes an instrument of critique of the art market, institutions, politics, and social norms.
Transgressive Function #
Viennese Actionism employed scatology as the ultimate form of taboo violation, radical deconstruction of the culturally constructed body.
Decolonial Function #
In the works of artists such as Chris Ofili, scatological materials (elephant dung) serve as instruments of decolonizing Western iconography.
Conclusion #
Scatology in art remains one of the most effective strategies for provocation, critique, and the reconceptualization of boundaries between the beautiful and the repugnant, the sacred and the profane, culture and nature. Through disgust, it forces the viewer to confront the repressed, taboo, and displaced—and thereby fulfills one of art’s fundamental functions: making the invisible visible.
Related Materials #
Sources #
-
Medievalists.net, “Holy Shit: Bosch’s Bluebird and the Junction of the Scatological and the Eschatological in Late Medieval Art” — https://www.medievalists.net/2011/01/holy-shit-bosch%E2%80%99s-bluebird-and-the-junction-of-the-scatological-and-the-eschatological-in-late-medieval-art/
-
Wikipedia, “Artist’s Shit” — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist%27s_Shit
-
DailyArt Magazine, “Viennese Actionism: Bestial and Sublime” — https://www.dailyartmagazine.com/viennese-actionism/
-
Smarthistory, “Chris Ofili, The Holy Virgin Mary” — https://smarthistory.org/chris-ofili-the-holy-virgin-mary/
-
Smarthistory, “Andres Serrano, Piss Christ” — https://smarthistory.org/andres-serrano-piss-christ/
-
TheArtStory, “Viennese Actionism Movement Overview” — https://www.theartstory.org/movement/viennese-actionism/
-
Cambridge Scholars Publishing, “Piero Manzoni’s Merda d’artista” — https://cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-0364-1746-8/
FolkUp Research Lab | Lucerna